The Common Program of the People's Republic of China 1949-1954


Article 9 of the Common Program

Before 1949, the Chinese approach to minorities can be characterized as follows: The state pursued two conflicting frontier policies towards non-Han ethnic groups, involving both cultural and military aspects. Primarily, the state aimed to "cherish" and "assimilate" frontier peoples through educational and moral guidance. Simultaneously, a "hands-off" approach was maintained to uphold the distinction between the Han Chinese (xia) and the non-Han (yi) peoples. However, in cases where non-Han groups resisted assimilation or posed a significant threat, the state resorted to military actions either to integrate them forcefully into the Chinese political realm or to defend against their incursions into the central plains. This perspective has shaped the approach to minority policies over the years. For reasons of defense, economic and social stability, and national pride, the current government placed significant emphasis on securing the loyalty of minority groups and bringing them under Chinese authority.

The CCP implemented this policy in 1944 in Yan'an, with the founding of the United Front Work Department. One of the tasks of this party organ was implementing minority policy. This department developed strategies for minority work. Li Weihan became its director and he played an important role in realizing the aims of the CCP in the field of nationalities.
On October 19, 1949, the State Ethnic Affairs Commission was established. Its role was to supervise and inspect all operations of the minority policy. The commission reported directly to the GAC. Li Weihan was also the chairman of this commission. (Li was assisted by three deputy chairmen, all from different ethnic groups Ulanhu (Mongolian), Liu Geping (Hui), and Saifuding (Uygur).

The responsibilities of this state organ were: To supervise the implementation of national Regional autonomy; To publicize policies concerning minority nationalities and check up on their implementation; To make concerted efforts in conjunction with the relevant departments within the GAC to promote socialist economic and cultural construction; To take charge of work related to minority languages in general; To take charge of minority nationalities' institutes and the work of training minority cadres and scientific and technological personnel; To organize and facilitate minority people's visits; To conduct constant study and investigation of minority nationalities and their areas, and to sum up experience in ethnic work; and to carry out tasks assigned by the GAC concerning nationalities affairs.

State propaganda in China during the early Communist era encouraged migration, for example, to Inner Mongolia as part of national construction and reunification, promising migrants the opportunity to settle and participate in restoring peaceful relations between the Han and Mongolian peoples. These campaigns combined socialist modernist ideals with sentimental references to ancient Han traditions, such as sending Han women to marry Mongolian tribesmen.
Mao's statement that "women hold up half the sky" underscored the need to mobilize women's labor for national construction. The recruitment of women was driven by a reproductive agenda to solidify territorial claims beyond the Great Wall by encouraging interethnic marriages. Additionally, women were enlisted as soldiers, teachers, doctors, laborers, and farmers to "liberate" and develop the northern frontier. There was also a concern that a male-dominated Han population on the frontier would be unsustainable, leading to the recruitment of Han women from eastern China to marry soldiers in party-arranged unions.
Details of the policy towards minorities are elaborated in Chapter 6 of the Common Program.


Mao (2017). Page 7 [↩] [Cite]
Mao (2017). Page 16 [↩] [Cite]
Kaup (2000). Pages 80-81 [↩] [Cite]
Klinger (2017). Page 88
"...nobody seems to mind if Mongol men take a Han wife, but residents frown upon ‘losing their women’ to the Han, even if the couple remains in the village.” Conversely, Han male contacts casually expressed the view that a Han man marrying a Mongolian woman was positive because he would get a spirited and healthy wife, while a Han woman marrying a Mongolian was potentially endangered by his wild masculinity. But in most cases, such commentators were quick to point out that a Han woman would have a positive influence on her Mongolian husband, and was thereby serving the nation, just as the ancient imperial brides had." Page 92 [↩] [Cite]

Chapter 1 of Common Program