The Common Program of The People's Republic of China 1949-1954


Article 57


This chapter examines the transformation of China’s foreign trade after the establishment of the PRC in 1949, emphasizing the tension between ideological goals, economic necessity, and Cold War constraints. Although Mao advocated “leaning to one side,” China’s weak industrial base meant that the new regime could not immediately pursue socialist self-sufficiency. With modern industry accounting for only about 10 percent of the economy, China remained dependent on foreign countries for industrial equipment, technology, and essential goods. The Common Program therefore allowed commercial relations with non-Soviet countries, while initially permitting private import-export businesses and foreign firms to operate in China.
From 1950 onward, however, the government progressively centralized and nationalized foreign trade. Licensing, registration, and state trading corporations enabled the government to monitor and increasingly monopolize international commerce. By 1953, the state controlled approximately 92 percent of both imports and exports. The resulting system sought to redirect trade toward the construction of a socialist economy, prioritizing imports of machinery, technology, and raw materials while encouraging exports of agricultural and light industrial products to finance industrialization.
Western containment sharply accelerated this process. COCOM restrictions in 1950 and the broader CHICOM embargo following China’s intervention in the Korean War severely limited access to Western markets, credit, technology, and foreign currency. China responded through barter, alternative trading networks, overseas Chinese merchants, smuggling, and closer economic cooperation with the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe.
Despite growing state control, illicit trade remained important because it supplied goods unavailable through official channels. Customs authorities therefore combined anti-smuggling campaigns with selective leniency toward overseas Chinese and ethnic minorities.
Ultimately, China’s foreign trade shifted rapidly toward the socialist bloc, but this did not amount to autarky. Trade continued to expand, increasingly focusing on production goods needed for industrialization. Soviet credits and technical assistance became crucial, particularly for defense and heavy industry, while agricultural products and minerals remained major Chinese exports.
The Soviet Union became China’s principal political and economic partner. Trade expanded rapidly, shifting from agricultural exports from northern China toward minerals and agricultural products from the south and southwest after 1952. Soviet technical assistance, particularly in transport and industrial development, was important, although geographical distance and transport costs made Soviet trade expensive.
Hong Kong remained a crucial commercial and financial intermediary despite the US embargo. Chinese and foreign trading companies used Hong Kong shipping and commercial networks to maintain access to international markets. The territory also generated valuable export surpluses for China. India developed significant economic and political ties with the PRC, including major Chinese grain supplies during India’s 1951 famine. Pakistan, Burma, and Ceylon likewise participated in commodity trade, often through barter arrangements.
Trade with Japan was economically valuable because China needed Japanese machinery, steel, equipment, and other industrial goods. However, US influence over Japanese foreign policy restricted the development of bilateral trade.
China’s relations with Eastern Europe were closely linked to Soviet policy. East European countries supplied machinery, technology, transportation equipment, and military goods in exchange for Chinese raw materials and agricultural products. Poland, Czechoslovakia, and the GDR became particularly important partners.
Trade with Western Europe continued despite political tensions and restrictions. China exported commodities such as tea, silk, wool, oils, and minerals, while importing machinery, chemicals, equipment, and wheat. France’s 1954 wheat deal helped pave the way toward diplomatic recognition. By contrast, trade with the United States and Canada was virtually nonexistent after the Korean War.
Overall, China’s trade was redirected toward the socialist bloc but remained globally connected. Foreign trade increasingly served industrialization, strategic security, and the acquisition of scarce resources and technology, rather than autarky.

The Common Program is formulated in such a way that maximum flexibility regarding the development of the economy is possible. Articles 54-56 stipulate that the PRC can develop friendship with non-Soviet and even imperialist nations. These articles contradict the statement of Mao Zedong that China will not take the middle road, but will ‘lean to one side’. However, the economic, ideological and political reality forces the Chinese leaders to take a more pragmatic view. The political leaders of the CCP have to deviate from traditional Marxist theory. Socialism can only be accomplished by a revolution. Mao Zedong stated:
"the proportions of industry and agriculture in the entire national economy of China were, modern industry about 10 per cent, and agriculture and handicrafts about 90 per cent. This was the result of imperialist and feudal oppression; this was the economic expression of the semi-colonial and semi-feudal character of the society of old China; and this is our basic point of departure for all questions during the period of the Chinese revolution and for a fairly long period after victory. This gives rise to a series of problems regarding our Party's strategy, tactics and policy…The two basic policies of the state in the economic struggle will be regulation of capital at home and control of foreign trade."
In other words, the proletariat class is too small and is not capable of conducting a socialist revolution at this moment. The economic situation compels the new regime to rely on essential materials from Western countries, because the SU cannot supply them.. On February 16, 1949, the CCP issues an instruction on foreign trade policy:
"we should import as much as possible from the Soviet Union and the new democratic countries any goods they can supply. We should only export or import goods to and from capitalist countries that are not needed or cannot be supplied by the Soviet Union and the new democratic countries."
Therefore, Article 57 of the Common Program states: the People's Republic of China may restore and develop commercial relations with foreign governments and peoples on the basis of equality and mutual benefit. The new government took concrete steps to stabilize foreign trade. For the time being, private management of import and export trade was permitted, and foreign firms were allowed to establish offices in China. To foster exports, the CC directed local governments to prioritize the production of exportable staple crops and goods, including cotton, soybeans, salt, peanuts, tobacco, silk, fur, handicrafts, and manufactured goods. Loans and other incentives were utilized to encourage increased production of these exportable commodities.
Year Japan West Europe Non-communist Communist
Export Import Export Import Export Import Export Import
1952 1,7 0,1 6,2 5,7 30,9 30 69,6 70
1953 2,9 0,4 11,7 9,1 35,6 29,5 66,4 70,5
1954 3,6 1,5 8,4 7,1 27,8 24,8 72,2 75,2
The GAC of the CPG promulgated on December 8, 1950 The Interim Regulations on the Administration of Foreign Trade, and the Trade Ministry of the Central People's Government (later renamed the Ministry of Foreign Trade) applied the licensing system to all import and export commodities from May 1951.
Much like the wartime GMD regime, the new government moved to register and regulate import–export activity. Control was exercised through the General Trade Company, which gradually spun off specialized corporations to monopolize strategic commodities such as textiles and minerals. The General Trade Company also established a central office to oversee all foreign trade, requiring private firms—much as under the wartime Import and Export Commission—to apply for approval before moving goods across national borders. These petitions provided the state with detailed knowledge of transnational trading practices and commercial networks. In 1951, for instance, the government founded the Yunnan Import and Export Corporation, creating a direct state competitor to private trading houses. From the outset, then, the Communist state was constructing new corporate institutions designed to rival and ultimately displace major international private firms such as Yongchangxiang.
From the outset, the new government prioritized the importation of industrial equipment and technology, considering them crucial for development. It was decided that traditional agricultural methods, operating within a reformed institutional framework, would suffice to achieve the necessary agricultural growth to support industrial goals. Fundamentally, China aimed to export sufficient quantities of food, textiles, and light industrial products to finance the importation of essential materials, equipment, and technology. Import duties were moderate or nonexisting for industrial equipment, raw materials, and other products essential for the development of heavy industry. Protective tariffs are levied on the imports of consumer goods. Production for exports always presides over production for domestic consumption. However, the government has to import Western grain because the domestic production is too low. Wheat is less expensive and contains higher protein than rice. Therefore, rice is exported and wheat is imported. Mao Zedong wants to become less dependent on these imports and suggests distributing grain rationally and to increase domestic production. The Central government accounts for this grain shortage by blaming black-market sales and hoarding.
On December 22, 1949, while Mao Zedong was in Moscow, he sent a telegram to the CC of the CCP, in which he stressed the necessity of trading with other countries (Germany, GB and the US) besides with the SU.

After the thirty-year Sino-Soviet treaty was signed on February 14, 1950, the Coordinating Committee of the Consultative Group (COCOM) decided in March 1950 to apply the same trade controls on China as on the SU and Eastern Bloc. The US denied also the grant of Marshall Aid to Western countries which might pass banned material to Communist countries. After China participated in the Korea War, the China Committee (CHICOM) was established with the aim to restrict international trade with China, Hong Kong, and Macau. China, like all other communist countries (except Yugoslavia) lost its US most-favored nation status in 1951. American banks ceased to provide credit in US dollars to foreign trading companies which were trading with China. Washington had previously adhered to a "foot-in-the-door" approach in its trade policy with China, anxiously and hopefully watching for signs that the Chinese Communists might demonstrate, through their actions, a readiness to be treated with a relatively normal trade relationship.
The CHICOM embargo list was about two times longer than the COCOM list. Neutral countries such as Sweden and Switzerland, as well India, Pakistan, Burma, Indonesia, Afghanistan and the Arabian League were not members of the embargo club. The Chicom embargo seriously affects HK trade to PCR in volume and percentage. However, in the beginning of 1953 West European countries are increasing their export to the PCR. To circumvent the Western embargo, Chinese leaders employed various strategies, including hidden trade networks, smuggling, and the temporary privatization of foreign trade. The PRC was able to build and maintain a complex trading network in Southeast Asia by mobilizing overseas Chinese merchants, European compradors, and party cadres. East European socialist allies also supported China by forming joint venture companies officially owned by the East European partner to facilitate the transport of strategic goods. For instance, the founding of the Sino-Polish Joint shipping company in Tianjin in 1951 was an attempt to undermine the embargo (See Article 36 ). Similarly, China aided the Soviet Union in acquiring embargoed rubber from Southeast Asia. To complement Soviet aid, the CCP also initiated large-scale rubber plantations in South China, which was seen as “the biggest technological cooperation project between China and the Soviet Union throughout the 1950s.” (See Article 43 ) The PRC’s most effective strategy to broadly counter the Western embargo was substituting Western technological goods with Eastern Bloc production. The US-led embargo profoundly shaped the CCP’s approach to economic statecraft in two critical ways. First, the experience of economic sanctions sharpened the CCP’s awareness of China’s economic vulnerability to Cold War geopolitical disruptions. CCP leaders had not foreseen the US-led trade embargo and were caught off guard by how swiftly it destabilized the Chinese economy.
Initially, the CCP had even hoped that the Korean War might boost China’s economy by opening new export opportunities for strategic goods like tung oil, silk, and animal hides. However, the imposition of sanctions shattered this expectation. The embargo effectively barred US and European firms from shipping goods to China, signing new trade agreements, or securing letters of credit in US dollars. Deprived of fresh foreign currency inflows, the CCP was forced to safeguard its dwindling reserves and turn to barter trade as a stopgap measure.

The new government starts immediately by monopolizing the external trade, and all private elements are disposed of. However, all the overseas Chinese businesses would be permitted to trade, and all export manufacturers owned by overseas Chinese are granted a temporary permit to export.
Former middlemen between the foreign merchants and the Chinese traders could only keep working if they worked on behalf of the state trading companies. On March 10, 1950, the government established 6 state foreign trade corporations: Bristles Corporation, the Native Produce Export Corporation, the Oils and Fats Corporation, the Import Corporation, the Tea Corporation, and the Minerals Corporation. Soon 5 more corporations were established China Petroleum Corporation, the China Egg Products Corporation, the China Silk Corporation, the China Skin and Fur Corporation, and the China Industrial Material and Equipment Corporation. In 1954 the list expanded with 4 corporations: The China National Foodstuffs Export Corporation, the China National Cereals and Oils Export Corporation, the China Silk Export Corporation, and the China Miscellaneous Articles Export Corporation. All of these corporations have offices in important cities throughout the mainland. They are separate legal entities; each corporation is a separate accounting unit and operate as a separate company. the corporation is not a consuming or producing unit-it is a middleman in the planned economy. The Ministry of Foreign Trade supervises and controls the corporations. See figure 37.1
In 1950, the government controlled 70% of imports and 54% of exports. In 1953, the numbers had increased to 92%. In the early 50’s, the intention and the organization of foreign trade of the government are distinctly socialist. ownership has still a dual character, however, also going in the direction of collective ownership. On March 10, 1950, the GAC promulgated   The Decisions on Procedures Governing the Unification of State-Operated Trade, and it outlines the government's goals of consolidating trade nationwide, directing the domestic market, balancing commodity supply and demand at both national and local levels, and facilitating the swift recovery and expansion of productive enterprises. Therefore, the government perceived economic growth and state oversight as closely interconnected. In other words, trade should leave the path of free trade and to become unified and support the socialist economy. In August 1952, the Ministry of Trade was divided into 2 ministries, one for internal and one for external trade. The foreign trade ministry has several corporations under control, like The China national Animal By-Products Imports and Export Corporation, like The China national Arts and Craft Imports and Export Corporation, and The China National Cereals, Oils Imports and Export Corporation. However, this system also exhibited a notable drawback, notably evident in trade dealings with Western nations and, to a lesser extent, with communist countries. This drawback was the limited direct connections between the buying and selling entities. Essentially, companies from Western nations were effectively prevented from engaging in direct communication with Chinese producers or buyers, leading to significant complications in trade with the PRC. As a result of this system, the exchange of information in trade between the PRC and other communist countries was more convoluted and sluggish.
The Committee for the Promotion of International Trade (PIT) is established in 1952 as an independent organ to establish contacts with foreign firms (of countries with no official ties with the PCR), to organize exhibitions of Chinese products in foreign countries, especially in Hong Kong, and inviting non-governmental trade delegations to China. The PIT is allowed to sign contracts and agreements, it is a non-governmental economic and trade organization composed of representatives and experts from the P.R.C.'s economic and trade circles. (Its board of directors includes officials from the MOFERT, the Bank of China, and other relevant departments.) One of the notable early achievements occurred on June 1, 1952 when a significant private trade agreement was signed with Japan. This agreement stipulated the exchange of £30 million worth of goods by the year's end. However, due to the Japanese government's refusal to sell certain restricted items like special steel, tin, locomotives, cranes, and trucks to China, only a small portion of the agreed-upon amount, approximately 5%, was actually traded. Nevertheless, this trade pact allowed Beijing to acquire essential commodities such as chemical fertilizer in exchange for coal. Consequently, the agreement ignited a heightened interest from Japan in the Chinese market, thereby exerting pressure on Tokyo to reconsider its trade restrictions with China. See also Article 56

The new government grappled with an ongoing battle against illicit coastal trade, particularly concerning Kong Yuan, director of the China General Customs Administration, who adopted a noticeably cautious stance reflecting his concerns that despite significant achievements in nationwide anti-smuggling efforts by customs, the smuggling situation persisted as a serious challenge. Despite increasingly stringent state regulations, various commodities continued to flow freely along the Chinese coast and penetrate into the interior regions. Nevertheless, the phenomenon of smuggling emerged as a crucial means to satisfy the everyday requirements of numerous individuals and various types of enterprises, including private and joint state-private entities. In the aftermath of the onset of the Korean War, notable figures such as Zhou Enlai and Bo Yibo advocated for the implementation of "organized mass smuggling" (zuzhi qunzhong zousi) in South China. The objective was to evade the United Nations embargo and procure vital resources, including fuel, medicine, and industrial hardware, which were urgently needed at that time. The main smuggling areas are along the coast, with Shanghai, Tianjin, Xiamen, Shantou and Guangzhou, but the primary source of smuggled goods came from the colonial enclaves Hong Kong and Macau.
Despite all administrative efforts and various anti-smuggling campaigns, smuggled consumer products continued to be openly peddled in Shanghai markets well into the 1960s. Similar black markets were active in other cities like Guangzhou and Tianjin, attracting buyers from all walks of life.

The newly formed General Customs Administration, founded on October 19, 1949, still kept several employees who had worked for the GMD administration, like the former Deputy Inspector Ding Guitang. At the beginning they were valued for their technical and administrative expertise. During the Sanfan, several staff members are fired. On April 18, 1951, the Provisional Customs Law was promulgated. The law stressed the importance of differentiating between major and minor cases of smuggling. Major smuggling was seen as counter revolutionary activities. However, most smugglers were not political motivated but by economics. Throughout Wufan (See Article 30), the public was urged to help fight smuggling and the People’s Courts held public trials and rallies for accused smugglers. The government was less lenient to traffickers who were officials. See also Article 40
Two groups are treated with lenience, Overseas Chinese and minorities. Overseas Chinese were permitted to bring personal goods into China without paying duties. Consequently, numerous travelers and returnees endeavored to capitalize on their politically privileged status and connections to foreign markets for profit or even sustenance. Despite persistent official encouragements, extending into the 1960s, for them to utilize state-run enterprises, many Overseas Chinese persisted in utilizing illicit channels to fulfill their requirements. Minorities are allowed to exchange commodities of daily necessities in small volumes in and out of China tax free.

The Sino-Soviet alliance, combined with the Western trade embargo, led to a rapid redirection of China's foreign trade. Within just three years, from 1950 to 1952, trade with non-communist countries was nearly halved, while the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe became dominant trading partners.
Year 1950 1951 1952
Ranking Country % Country % Country %
1 Soviet Union 30 Soviet Union 41,3 Soviet Union 54,9
2 United States 21,1 Hong Kong Macau 31,8 Hong Kong Macau 15,7
3 Hong Kong Macau 14,5 Czechoslovakia 3,6 GDR 5,5
4 United Kingdom 6,5 GDR 3 Czechoslovakia 6
5 Malaysia 5,4 Poland 2,6 Pakistan 4,2
This shift should not be seen as a move toward autarky; China’s foreign trade grew faster than global trade, making it the eleventh or twelfth largest in the world by 1959. After the Korean War ended, trade with non-communist countries gradually increased, and by 1957, it had recovered to pre-1950 levels, though it grew at a slower pace than trade with Eastern Europe.






The nature of trade was shifting from daily necessities to production goods, specifically those required for constructing a socialist economy. The Sino-Soviet agreement of 1950 provided the PRC with a $300 million credit. China was obligated to repay the credits and interest through deliveries of goods, including raw materials, tea, gold, and American dollars. The prices, quantities, and delivery dates for raw materials and tea were to be set by separate agreements, with prices consistently pegged to world market prices. However, a big part of the loan is used for purchase of war material for the Korea War and for expanding and rebuilding of the defense industry. Besides money, the SU also provided technical and technological documentation for the production of military equipment. In the period between 1949-1954 the trade balance of the PCR is negative, the import of production goods exceeds the export, so a part has to be financed by SU loans. On October 12, 1954, the SU and PCR signed a new agreement in which the SU provided China with a credit of 520 million rubles to finance the construction of 15 new industrial enterprises and the expansion of 141 enterprises already under construction. See Summary of 156 projects and Article 26.
"Agricultural produce-ranging from tea, silk and vegetable oils to cereals and hides-continues to dominate Chinese exports, although the proportion of non-ferrous and scarce metals in total exports- antimony, molybdenum, wolfram etc. has increased. Exports of pig iron and coking coal, which formerly went to Japan, are now exported to the USSR and Eastern Europe" Initially, for the first two years, the PRC's exports were limited to agricultural products primarily sourced from the north and northeastern regions. Following the gradual restoration of infrastructure, exports increased significantly. By 1952, nonferrous metals from the south and southwestern areas of China became the top commodity in Soviet imports from the PRC. Concurrently, the list of agricultural products also expanded as resources from China's central and southern provinces were increasingly utilized.
Year Imports Exports
1950 0.06 1.23
1951 0.00 1.97
1952 0.00 1.53
1953 0.01 1.83
1954 0.03 1.71
Recognition Date Country Region Trade Relation
1949
3-10-1949 SU 1 1949
3-10-1949 Bulgaria 3 1952
3-10-1949 Rumania 3 1953
4-10-1949 Hungary 3 1951
4-10-1949 North Korea 1 1953
5-10-1949 Czechoslovakia 3 1950
5-10-1949 Poland 3 1950
5-10-1949 Yugoslavia 3 1955
6-10-1949 Outer Mongolia 1 1952
27-10-1949 GDR 3 1950
20-11-1949 Albania 3 1954
16-12-1949 Myanmar 1 1954
29-12-1949 India 1 1950
1950
5-1-1950 Pakistan 1 1953
6-1-1950 GB 4 1952
7-1-1950 Ceylon 2 1952
9-1-1950 Denmark 4 1957
9-1-1950 Israel * 5  
10-1-1950 Norway 4 1958
12-1-1950 Afghanistan 2 1957
13-1-1950 Finland 4 1952
14-1-1950 Sweden 4  
15-1-1950 DR Vietnam 1 1954
17-1-1950 Switzerland 4  
17-1-1950 Lichtenstein 4  
27-3-1950 The Netherlands 4 1952
28-3-1950 Indonesia 2 1956
>1954
16-5-1956 Egypt 5 1954
* France 4 1952
* Japan 2 1952
* West Germany 4 1952
* Chili 5 1952
* not recognized

Date Treaty
1949  
30-7-1949 a trade agreement between the SU and the Northeast government is signed
11-10-1949 Barter Agreement for Two Transactions SU and the North Eastern People's Government.
1950  
19-1-1950 Sino Vietnam trade agreement on military supplies
1-3-1950 Sino-Polish Barter Agreement
27-3-1950 Sino-SU Civil Aviation Company is established
11-4-1950 Ratification of the PRC-USSR pact of Feb. 14
19-4-1950 Supply by the SU to PRC of Industrial Equipment and Materials from 1950 to 1952
14-6-1950 Sino-Czechoslovak Trade Agreement for 1950
10-10-1950 Sino-German Trade Agreement for 1951
1951  
22-1-1951 Sino-Hungarian Trade Agreement for 1951
29-1-1951 Sino-Polish Agreement Concerning Exchange of Goods and Payments in 1951
19-2-1951 SU-PRC draft agreement to start building factories to repair and service planes
25-4-1951 Second Sino-Indian Rice Trade Contract
22-5-1951 Third Sino-Indian Rice Trade Contract
June 1951 The creation of the China-Polish Joint Shipping Company
15-6-1951 Sino-Soviet Agreement on Supply of Equipment and Materials by the SU to PRC
21-6-1951 Sino-Czechoslovak Trade Agreement for 1951
1952  
29-3-1952 Sino-Soviet Protocol on Mutually-Agreed Terms for the Delivery of Goods
12-4-1952 Protocol on SU Supplies to PRC of Equipment and Materials in 1952
14-4-1952 Sino-French Trade Agreement
14-4-1952 Sino-Dutch Trade Agreement
14-4-1952 Sino-British Trade Agreement
4-5-1952 China Council for the Promotion of International Trade is established
26-5-1952 4th Sino-Indian Rice Trade Contract
1-6-1952 Sino-Japanese private trade agreement is signed
25-6-1952 Sino-West German Trade Agreement
11-7-1952 Sino-Polish Trade Agreement for 1952
15-7-1952 Protocol Extending and Revising the "Sino-Czechoslovak Trade Agreement for 1951
21-7-1952 Sino-Bulgarian Trade Agreement for Exchange of Goods and Payments in 1952
21-7-1952 Protocol Extending and Revising the 1951 Agreement China Hungary
30-7-1952 Sino-Rumania Agreement on Exchange of Goods and Payments for 1952
9-8-1952 Sino-French Contract for Barter Trade
21-9-1952 Sino-Soviet-Finnish Agreement on Supply of Commodities in 1952
4-10-1952 Sino-Ceylonese General Trade Agreement
13-10-1952 5th Sino-Indian Rice Trade Contract
23-10-1952 Sino-Chilean Trade Agreement
26-11-1952 Sino-Japanese Barter Contract
Dec.1952 economic and cultural cooperation treaty signed with Mongolia
3-12-1952 Sino-Bulgarian Trade Agreement for 1953
18-12-1952 Sino-Ceylonese 5-Year Agreement on Rubber and Rice Trade
31-12-1952 Protocol Extending the Sino-Japanese Trade Agreement by Half a Year to June 30, 1953
1953  
19-1-1953 Sino-Rumanian Goods Exchange and Payment Agreement for 1953
24-2-1953 Sino-Mongolian Non-Trading Credit Agreement
14-3-1953 Sino-Pakistani Cotton and Coal Agreement
21-3-1953 Protocol to the Sino-Soviet Agreement Concerning the Granting of Credit to China
30-3-1953 Sino- Hungary Barter and Payment Agreement for 1953
30-4-1953 Sino-German Goods Exchange and Payment Agreement for 1953
May 1953 SU decides to help in construction of 91 additional industrial plants in PRC
7-5-1953 Sino-Czechoslovak Goods Exchange and Payment Agreement for 1953
15-5-1953 PRC and the SU sign the document on the aid to be given to PRC by the SU
25-5-1953 Sino-Polish Goods Exchange and Payments Agreement for 1953
5-6-1953 Sino-Finnish Goods Exchange and Payments Agreement for 1953
5-6-1953 Sino-French Trade Agreement
6-7-1953 Sino-British Commercial Agreement
16-7-1953 Sino- Hungarian agreement on trade in postal services and telecommunications
9-8-1953 Protocol Supplementary to the 1953 Sino-East German Agreement
20-8-1953 Sino-Mongolian Goods Exchange and Payment Agreement for 1953
15-9-1953 27th Session of the CPGC in Beijing
21-9-1953 Sino-Ceylonese Rubber and Rice Contracts
29-10-1953 Sino-Japanese Trade Agreement of 1953
19-11-1953 North Korea signed 10-year aid pact with Peking.
23-11-1953 Sino-North Korean Economic and Cultural Cooperation Agreement
30-11-1953 Sino-Indonesian Trade Agreement
1954  
13-1-1954 Protocol on the Sino-Soviet Agreement Concerning the Granting of Credit to PRC
23-1-1954 Protocol on the Sino-Soviet Agreement Concerning the Granting of Credit to PRC
19-2-1954 Sino-Polish Goods Exchange and Payment Agreement for 1954
25-3-1954 Sino-Bulgarian Goods Exchange and Payment Agreement for 1954
30-3-1954 Sino-German Goods and Payment Agreement for 1954
7-4-1954 Sino-Mongolian Trade Agreement for 1954
19-4-1954 Sino-Rumanian Trade and Payment Agreement for 1954
22-4-1954 Sino-Burmese Three Year Trade Agreement
27-4-1954 Sino-Czechoslovak Goods Exchange and Payment Agreement for 1954
29-4-1954 Chinese and Indian governments sign agreement
30-4-1954 Sino-Hungarian Trade and Payment Agreement for 1954
20-5-1954 Sino-North Korean Agreement on the Rate of Exchange between the National Currencies
3-6-1954 218th Plenary Session of the GAC approves Sino-Indian agreement
21-6-1954 Sino-Finnish Trade Agreement from May 1, 1954 to April 30, 1955
7-7-1954 PRC and the D.R. Vietnam announce an agreement on aid to D.R. Vietnam
21-7-1954 Sino-Indian Trade Agreement on Tobacco
22-8-1954 Sino-Egyptian trade agreement
Sept. 1954 Dong Biwu visits Bulgaria
1-9-1954 Sino-Indonesian Trade and Payment Protocol & payment agreement
4-9-1954 Sino-North Korean Protocol for the Exchange of Goods in 1954
8-10-1954 Sino-Ceylonese Rubber and Rice Contracts
14-10-1954 Sino-Indian Trade Agreement
14-10-1954 Sino-Albanian cultural agreement is signed
19-10-1954 Sino-Indian Agreement on Tobacco and Raw Silk
3-11-1954 Sino-Burmese Protocol on the Exchange of Commodities

On April 19, 1950, the first trade agreement between the SU and the PCR is signed, to emphasize the importance of the deal a ceremony was staged in Beijing on September 30, 1950. One of conditions is that prices for goods featured in Soviet-Chinese trade will be set in rubles on the basis of the prices existing on the world market. The preceding year served as an index for fixing prices. See article 4 of the agreement. In September 1949, the first commercial transactions between the SU and China were concluded. The North China Foreign Trade Company and Soviet foreign trade organizations came to an agreement to mutual deliver goods worth 31 million rubles. Since 1946, the Soviets offered economic and technical assistance to local CCP governments in Northeast and Northern China. Trade between Northeast China and the Soviet Union increased significantly, rising from 413 million to 916 million roubles between 1947 and 1949, with most of the trade occurring in communist-controlled areas. In 1948, the Soviet government dispatched specialists to support railway construction in Northeast China, addressing critical transport challenges. This effort later facilitated the mobilization of communist troops via railway transport, contributing to the CCP’s victory in the region.
Given the poor transport situation in 1950, the bulk of the export to the SU were agricultural products from the north and northeast of China, later on, from 1952 onwards when the new regime had full control over the mainland, nonferrous metals from the south and southwest became the main export products. In addition, agricultural products from central and southern China became available for export.
1950 1951 1952
Amount % Amount % Amount %
Raw agricultural products 60.5 35.1 77.7 26 112.5 30.2
Foodstuff 20 11,3 20.7 6,9 50.1 13,8
Nonferrous&alloy metals 18.4 10,7 41.2 13,8 65.8 17,7
Textile yarns semi finished 15.3 8,9 27.2 9,1 35 9,4
Industrial textiles 3.2 1,1 13.3 3,6
Animal byproducts 9 5,2 15.4 5,1 28.8 7,6
Chemicals 1.5 0.8 1.1 0.4 2.1 0.6
Arts & crafts 0.3 0,1
Total 124.7 72 186.5 62.4 307.6 82.9
1950 1951 1952 1953 1954
Machinery 37.2 98.8 140.9 145.2 179
Equipment sets 0.9 30.9 36.6 44.3 83.8
Petroleum products 8.7 33 25.6 36.4 35.5
Rolled steel 35.6 47.2
Chemicals 2.6 2.4 1.1 0.9 1
Paper 3.6 10 14.9 8 5.6
Cotton goods 3.6 13.3 2.9 0.4 1.5
Stationary 1.9 2.7
Particularly in a province like Xinjiang, which is close to the border with the SU and rich in minerals, the change in trade volumes which took place, is abundantly clear. China’s trade with the Soviet bloc faced significant logistical challenges due to its geographical distance from the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. Most exports and imports had to travel overland via the Trans-Siberian Railway, which substantially increased both the cost and time required for transport. Some estimates indicate that this geographical separation added as much as 30 percent to the cost of China’s imports from the Soviet Union compared to what Eastern European countries paid. Additionally, Soviet and Eastern European goods and industrial expertise were frequently considered less well-suited to China’s specific needs than those provided by other long-standing economic partners, such as Japan.
Already in February 1949, a group of Chinese merchants in Singapore set up a barter deal with China. Shipments of rubber from Malaya were shipped to Hong Kong in exchange for soya beans from Northeast China.
Year Export Import Total Balance
Value % Value % Value % Value
1950 150.2 32,2 255.8 58,7 406 45 -105.6
1951 151.1 22,5 280.7 27,2 431.8 25,3 -129.6
1952 145.3 15,3 91 8,1 236.3 11,4 54.3
1953 150 13,3 94.6 6,7 244.4 9,6 55.4
1954 121.1 10,1 68.4 4,7 189.5 7,1 52.7
"After 1951, Mainland China reaps an enormous amount of export surplus in her trade with Hong Kong and this surplus forms an important portion of foreign exchange for her to cover her trade deficits elsewhere end to repair her external debts." On December 3, 1950, the US administration introduced a complete embargo for PRC, Hong Kong and Macau. The US asked her allies to do the same. The UK government tried a different approach for Hong Kong. In the aftermath of the International Economic Conference in Moscow not only the PCR established the PIT (see above ) but also a Chinese Council for the Promotion of International Trade was founded. The members of both councils had close ties with Chinese-British trade companies before 1949. The UK refused to implement shipping controls. Indeed, British business maintained its connections with mainland China through Hong Kong. Shipping companies registered in Hong Kong, as well as in Singapore, Liberia, and Panama, facilitated the alteration of British or Chinese goods, making it challenging to ascertain their true origins and enabling trade through Hong Kong to persist. While many of these shipping companies displayed the British flag, approximately 50 percent of the shipping services utilized for Socialist China's trade were provided by vessels flying the Greek flag. According to Shao's analysis in 1991, it became evident during the latter half of 1950 that the Chinese government's trading activities had a significant presence in Hong Kong. This presence encompassed various entities involved in trade, banking, and other sectors, which were inherited from the previous regime, along with their assets and personnel. Additionally, new enterprises affiliated with Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, and Guangzhou were established, functioning as branches of these respective organizations. Some of these enterprises were established as Hong Kong-based companies, with or without explicit official affiliations. It became apparent that these newly formed organizations had effectively established their reputation, prompting many European firms to prefer engaging with them rather than maintaining previous business connections.
However, there was a decline which can be attributed to three primary factors: 1. The "Three Antis" and "Five Antis" Movements on the mainland essentially halted business activities during the first half of the year. 2. Direct shipments of edible oil from the mainland to Eastern European buyers reduced Hong Kong's entrepot trade correspondingly. 3. Western European countries decreased their import quotas for edible oils to reduce their foreign exchange expenditure.
The primary product India exported to China was jute products. Trade with India also carried a strong political motive. In 1951, when India faced a severe famine, China provided significant relief through a barter arrangement. This included agreements signed in the fall of 1951 for China to supply 66,000 tons of rice and 442,000 tons of sorghum. Further agreements followed in 1952 for an additional 150,000 tons of rice (100,000 tons on May 26 and 50,000 tons on October 13). Following these political gestures, the volume of trade between the PRC and India increased rapidly until stabilizing around 1956. This growing economic relationship likely had a considerable influence on India's position in the international arena regarding matters affecting the PRC.
On October 14, 1954, India and China signed a two-year trade agreement, outlining a comprehensive list of goods that each country would export to the other. Chinese exports encompassed cereals, machinery, minerals, silk, animal products, paper and stationery, chemicals, and oils, while Indian exports comprised grams, rice, pulses, unmanufactured tobacco, minerals and ores, wood and timber, fibers, textiles, skins, chemicals, and machinery. The immediate impact of the treaty was notable: trade during 1954–55 saw a seven-fold increase compared to the previous year, although it represented a relatively small portion of India's global trade, amounting to only 1.2 percent.
The trade with Pakistan consists largely of the export of raw cotton and jute and the import of cotton twist and yarn. "...,in 1952, Pakistan had exported $ 84 million worth of commodities to China and only $2.2 million value of imports from China. Both sides trade volume reached $86 million. However, the export volume was decreased in next year’s and the bilateral trade volume in 1953 $7.2 million, in 1954"
As seen in (Article 56) Burma is the first noncommunist country which recognizes the People's Republic of China, however the realtionship is tense. As a gesture of goodwill, in December 1954, the PRC procured 150,000 tons of Burmese rice at a price higher than the prevailing world market rate, as stipulated in a trade pact between the two nations. Concurrently, the United States provided food aid, including rice, to countries in the region, thereby driving down the market price of rice, a key export commodity for Burma. This economic development adversely affected Burma's economy. Additionally, tensions arose because Burma's government was in conflict with the Taiwan government and the United States due to their failure to address the presence of Nationalist Chinese soldiers who had fled China in 1949 and were still stationed in Burma, exerting significant influence over certain regions of the country.
Despite Beijing's inclination towards secrecy, China has disclosed some relevant information regarding its military and economic assistance to North Korea. In October 1951, General Chen Yi of the PLA stated that the Chinese government had supplied 897 planes, 33 artillery pieces, 17 anti-aircraft guns, and two tanks to support the "Resist America, Aid Korea" campaign. However, quantifying the monetary value of this aid proved challenging due to the absence of published prices for Chinese weapons. Nevertheless, it is highly likely that China offered significantly more military and economic assistance during that time than the aforementioned list suggests, and certainly continued to provide even greater support later on. Furthermore, Copper notes that China's aid to North Korea underwent a shift towards a more formal and less classified framework in late 1953, following the signing of an armistice that brought an end to the hostilities. During this period, China announced the cancellation of a debt totalling $56.9 million and offered new assistance in the form of a nonrepayable grant amounting to $338 million, designated for the purpose of repairing war-related damages. Additionally, China allocated funds to cover the expenses of its troops remaining in North Korea.


In the 1950s, the US government dictated the foreign policy of Japan. From 1949 until June 1950, the US administration was encouraging Japanese trade with the PRC The US-Japan Security Treaty signed on September 8, 1951, gave the Japanese few possibilities to make official contacts with the PCR.
However, on November 1, 1949, a private organization organized by Japanese businessmen requested permission to visit Beijing to discuss the possibility of establishing trade ties with the PRC government. By the end of 1950, Sino-Japanese trade closely resembled the type of commerce that had occurred between occupied China and Japan before and during World War II. For example, in 1949 and 1950, China's main imports from Japan included industrial products worth millions of US dollars, such as motors, generators, electric furnaces, steel, galvanized iron sheets, copper wire, and machinery for paper and textile manufacturing, as well as steel rails and railroad equipment. In fact, during 1950–1951, Japan exported 61 percent of its total bar steel, 37 percent of its steel plates, and 14 percent of its galvanized iron sheets to China. Most of these Japanese imports entered China through the Northeast port of Yingkou and were then transported to Japanese-built plants and factories in former Manchuria, such as the mills in Jilin and Shenyang.
On June 1, 1952, and October 29, 1953, trade agreements were concluded with the People's Republic of China. These agreement were valid for one year. The goods China exports are coal, iron ore, but the most important is rice. Japan delivers chemicals, equipment, and transportation media. " Under the terms of each of the first three Sino-Japanese trade agreements, the total volume of twoway trade provided for sixty million pounds sterling,45 but for the first agreement, the actual transactions only amounted to 5.05 per cent of the total sum; for the second, 38.8 per cent; ... Peking blamed the United States for the Japanese failure to fulfill the trade obligations but had no legal recourse to force the Japanese government to remedy the situation.47"
Import % Export %
Chemicals Iron &
steel
products
Machinery Misc. Soybeans Coal Salt Rice Beans Misc.
1952 39 1,8 22,2 34,1 0,6 5,1 0,3 28,4 65,7
1953 51,8 5,7 20,4 19,4 11,8 5,4 12,5 20,4 49,9
1954 81,9 1,5 3,8 4,4 18,2 1,4 8,4 30,7 7,1 34,3

On October4, 1952, Ceylon and PRC made a trade agreement about a rubber-rice barter. Ceylon was affected by a worldwide rice shortage and a severe drop in rubber prices. China had a surplus in rice and a shortage on natural rubber due to the embargo.


The Eastern Europe countries did not have an independent policy towards the Chinese government. They acted in line with the directives of the SU. The main directive of this policy is to aid a ‘brotherly’ nation. In the 1950s, the Beijing government recognized to some extent the lack of complete independence in Czechoslovak politics concerning the PRC and did not anticipate any significant deviations in the Czechoslovak-Chinese relations from the pattern of Sino-Soviet relations. Consequently, this situation was somewhat advantageous for both the Czechoslovaks and the Chinese. This observation can be applied to all Eastern Europe countries under SU control. Both the Soviets and the Chinese showed a keen interest in learning from and adopting practices from Eastern and Central Europe. Conversely, the Central Europeans and the Chinese demonstrated greater enthusiasm for fostering trade and collaboration with each other compared to their interactions with the Soviets. They voiced concerns about the initial requirement to go through Moscow as an intermediary in their budding exchanges. In general, Sino-Eastern European trade was dominated by the exchange of raw materials, agricultural products and light industry goods, delivered by the Chinese, for heavy industry goods from Eastern Europe. The GDR and Czechoslovakia, with their edges in heavy industry and technology, each ranked third or fourth among China’s trading partners, just behind the Soviet Union and Hong Kong, the GDR served as a crucial intermediary in China’s trade with the West, especially West Germany, in the 1950s.
In 1950 the trade balance was positive, 70 million US$, in 1951 it became negative -50; 1952: -105; 1953: -215 and in 1954 -205
Poland expands his merchant fleet to export railway equipment, steel and tractors from the SU and other East Bloc countries, on the route to China, the ships load rubber at Ceylon. Officially the China-Polish Joint Shipping Company was established on 29 January 1951 in Beijing and went into effect in June of that year. Each side agreed to contribute six ships and establish head offices in Gdynia and Tianjin (later moved to Shanghai) The ownership of the Chinese ships was kept confidential. Both governments had a 50% share. The company started with 4 old vessels. Poland was placed third after the GDR and Czechoslovakia as trade partner of the PRC.
Like other East Bloc countries, Czechoslovakia helped Beijing overcome the problems arising from the trade embargo. Czechoslovakia became an important trade partner in relatively advanced technologies and in deliveries of military equipment. Machinery, trucks, and pipes were among the main commodities (construction materials, compressors, cars, buses, tractors, telephones, turbines, boilers, telecommunications equipment, diesel motors, and other goods) exported. During the Korea war they supplied military equipment (for example almost 100 airplanes). The PRC, in return delivered iron ore, wolfram, molybdenum, tungsten, zinc, oil, wool, leather, tobacco, fish, meat, seeds, beans, rice, poultry, and other agricultural products. On May 6, 1952, an agreement concerning scientific and technical co-operation was signed.
In July 1953, China provided East Germany with 50 million rubles worth of food. The GDR exported optical equipment and helped with radio, cement, and sugar-processing factories. At the time Mao said:
“They are much harder up than we are. We must make it our business to take care of them.” East Germany, of course, had a standard of living much, much higher than China."
In general, Sino-Eastern European trade was dominated by the exchange of raw materials, agricultural products and light industry goods, delivered by the Chinese, for heavy industry goods from Eastern Europe.

Year Europa Total trade Percentage
1952 101.1 1840 5,5
1953 221 2340 9,4
1954 182,8 2390 7,7
Trade with Western countries includes, vegetable oil, oil seeds, tea, wool, silk and foodstuff. Import tractors, electric power equipment, machine tools, chemical products. Wheat is imported from Canada and Australia in 1953 and 1954. In 1953 Belgium, Luxemburg, and FRG export chemical fertilizers.
Finland's main exports were paper and wood pulp. Its trade with China was governed by a three-party contract where the Soviet Union acted as the clearing party. All transactions between Finland and China were settled in rubbles.
Switzerland exported dyes, textile machinery, and medicines.


Both West Germany and China valued their trade relationship. For West Germany, China was a vital source of raw materials; materials like tungsten and soybean had few comparable substitutes, while others, such as bristle and egg yolk, were cheaper to import from China. The Communist government, in turn, was attracted by the high quality of West German products. However, all trade between the two nations was indirect, requiring goods to pass through third countries. Trade between the two countries took place in a indirect way, all goods outbound to and inbound from China had to go through third countries.
From June 28 till July 9, 1954, a Chinese trade mission visited the UK. "They were given specific instructions by the authorities in Beijing to explain China's good faith and desire to normalise trade with Britain, and to be even-handed towards various British trade groups. The mission held discussions with about 25 trade associations, visited some 19 works, attended two well-arranged exhibitions, and held business talks with 56 firms."
Year Class 1 Class II Class III Total
1949 2202.6 1269.9 146.1 3618.6
1950 7111.3 2208.3 1004.3 10323.9
1951 3464.2 3163.1 1042.4 7669.7
1952 2068.5 655.3 287.9 3011.7
1953 4801.5 4919.2 501.4 10222.1
1954 3139.6 4447.9 1371.1 8958.6
The agreement between France and the PRC in 1954 was politically driven. France sold one million tons of wheat to China, a deal that France deemed economically advantageous. This transaction played a significant role in paving the way for French diplomatic recognition of the People's Republic of China.

In 1950, after the start of the Korean War, the trade between the PRC and US and Canada is almost nihil.


In 1953 and 1954 Argentina exports wheat to China, it was limited a trade (non-governmental only). In addition to the absence of political ties, China's trade connections with the nations in Region 5 during the early 1950s were constrained. From 1950 to 1955, China's overall trade with Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Oman, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen amounted to just US$1.7 million, with Chinese imports accounting for over 75 percent of that total.
The trade with Egypt consisted mainly of cotton import.

O'Brien (2004). Page 108 [↩] [Cite]
Patterson Giersch (2020). Page 195 "...the firm (Yongchangxiang) controlled an estimated 110 billion renminbi in fixed and liquid assets distributed among its import-export businesses, its stake in silk-reeling workshops, and its investment in tin mines and refineries. The firm came to support a workforce of approximately three thousand scattered from Sichuan to Shanghai to Hong Kong, India, and Burma." Page 27 [↩] [Cite]
Mitcham (2005). Page 4 [↩] [Cite]
a.k.a. ‘the Paris Group, created in 1949 with the following countries: Belgium, Canada (1950), Denmark (1950), France, West Germany (1950), Greece (1953), Italy, Japan (1953), Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway (1950), Portugal (1952), Turkey (1953), United Kingdom, and United States. Its purpose is to inhibit the transfer of military or dual use technologies to the SU and Eastern Bloc countries. The counterpart is the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance or Comecon (January 1949). The members included SU, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Albania and, East Germany. Although the PRC wanted to become a member, Stalin refused.
Libbey (2010) remarks "The explanations for Comecon’s birth are only vaguely related to the notion of a common market. First, and most obviously, the group gave substance and organization to the Soviet Union’s economic war with Yugoslavia. This war had a side benefit of providing the institutional means of excluding Yugoslavia’s disease of independence from Eastern Europe’s economic development." (2010). Page 141 [↩] [Cite]
Cain (1995). "The lists were divided into four categories or classes. Class 1 included all military goods such as guns, ammunition or tanks, or machinery for their manufacture, such as special machine tools and extrusion presses, electronic equipment, vacuum tube machinery, blast furnaces, oil drilling equipment, tractors, trucks, merchant ships, and all strategic chemicals such as benzine, sodium, mercury, all nitrates and nitric acid, tin, zinc, lead and copper. Class 1A included military and semi-military items such as radio equipment, ultra-violet equipment, broad-band communication equipment and large pressure vessels. Class 2 contained products of industrial potential to the East such as road-building equipment, excavators, engines, steel, cast-iron and plate glass. In Class 3 were items regarded as important in maintaining the basic economy such as office machinery, plumbing equipment, needles and matches. Class 4 was the catch-all category embracing all items not elsewhere listed." Page 34 [↩] [Cite]
Most-favored-nation status guarantees a nondiscriminatory US tariff rate to the foreign exporter. [↩]
Zhang (2014) "..., a total of $61 million worth of purchase orders that China had issued, including for goods already loaded on ships, had been sanctioned, and as much as $120 million to $130 million worth of purchase orders would soon be embargoed, of which about $100 million belonged to the state-owned companies. For another, the US government had frozen as much as $5 million of China's “immature" bank bills of exchange in American banks. An additional 60 million to 70 million British pounds of Chinese assets were likely to be frozen by London soon. 32" Page 27 [↩][Cite]
Zhang (2001) Page 31 [↩][Cite]
The China list contained 400 items against 200 placed on the European list. The US permitted Japan to secretly reduce the 400 items closer to the 200 imposed on the Europeans [↩]
A large part of the increased imports consisted of steel and iron products and machinery from France and FRG. Synthetic textile, fibers from Italy. The UK exported more industrial and chemical fertilizers and also wool and textile machinery. November 1949: 86, November 1951: 270, January 1952: 285, March 1954: 265, August 1954: 170 items were on the COCOM list.
Country Jan-March 1952 Jan-March 1953
Finland 68.000 4.691.000
France 283.000 3.274.000
Germany 385.000 2.484.000
Italy 784.000 2.259.000
Norway 69.000 1.622.000
Sweden 463.000 1.202.000
Switzerland 13.000 22.000
United Kingdom 658.000 9.957.000
Ceylon 3.171.000 14.687.000
Hong Kong 9.119.000 40.179.000
Pakistan 21.733.000 0
China used trade as a means of increasing its investment rate, importing such producer goods as metal-cutting tools, forging-press equipment, and rolled steel in exchange for exports of raw and processed agricultural goods, textiles, and minerals.
Total trade Socialist countries Capitalist countries
Year Total Export Import Balance Total Export Import Balance Total Export Import Balance
1950 1.20 0.62 0.59 0.03 0.35 0.21 0.14 0.07 0.86 0.41 0.45 -0.04
1951 1.90 0.78 1.12 -0.34 0.98 0.47 0.52 -0.05 0.92 0.31 0.61 -0.30
1952 1.89 0.88 1.02 -0.14 1.32 0.61 0.71 -0.10 0.58 0.27 0.31 -0.04
1953 2.30 1.04 1.26 -0.22 1.56 0.67 0.89 -0.22 0.74 0.37 0.37 0.00
1954 2.35 1.06 1.29 -0.23 2.25 0.95 1.30 -0.35 0.79 0.43 0.36 0.07
[↩]
See for example RMRB 21-07-1952 The Czechoslovak ship "Republic" arrived in Tianjin [↩]
Wu (2023). Page 31
"The overseas Chinese communities in Southeast Asia were at the center of this regional trading network. Dispersed across all of Southeast Asia, the eleven million overseas Chinese bore demographical and economic significance in their countries of residence.6...this group managed to connect the various regions of Southeast Asia via their own trading networks based on clan associations (tong xiang hui) and trade guild halls (tong ye huey guan) and that these communities maintained important connections to China’s economy through overseas remittances.7" Page 35
"Foreign trade departments and banks in various regions took appropriate measures to rescue import and export materials based on specific situation. The export materials on their way to the U.S., which were shipped before the freeze, were required to be transported to Hong Kong, Rangoon, Singapore, Calcutta, Mumbai and Karachi, where the materials can be unloaded, processed, and payment can be made with the guarantee of Bank of China's local branches. The materials on the way to China were required to be unloaded in relatively safe ports in Calcutta, Mumbai, Rangoon, Karachi, Singapore and Hong Kong, where all procedures of delivery, custody and transit shipment would be completed by Bank of China's local branches."
[Cite]
Chen (2022). Page 597 "Even the landlocked Czechoslovak Republic founded a trade navy company that operated as a cover for PRC-owned ships in the 1950s. A company based in the PRC would not have been allowed to purchase the ships in western countries, register them with Lloyd’s (which was of great importance for insurance costs) or ship goods in international waters – the Czechoslovak flag made all these things possible.132" Page 605 [↩][Cite]
Wang (1973). Pages 196-197 [Cite]
The Ministry of Foreign Trade had four divisions responsible for economic relations with different parts of the world and several functional departments. The first division was responsible for commercial dealing with the Soviet Union, North Korea, North Vietnam, and Mongolia. The second division was accountable for trade with the socialist countries of Eastern Europe. The third managed trade with Western countries, and the fourth division managed trade with developing countries in Asia. Africa, and Latin America. [↩]
Hung (1968). The China Publication Centre, which is not a corporation, is responsible for the export of books and periodicals. Officially, they are not considered a trading corporation and therefore, not directly under the Ministry of External Trade. Pages 5-10 [↩] [Cite]
Skřivan (2017). Page 167 [↩] [Cite]
In 1952, the China Committee for Promotion of International Trade compiles "New Chinas Economic Achievements 1949-1952." [↩]
Mitcham (2005). Page 6 [↩] [Cite]
Thai (2017). Page 2 [↩] [Cite]
Thai (2017). Pages 2-3 and 6[Cite]
Zhang (2010) writes "They (zhou and Bo) also wanted all the customs agents, foreign trade administrators, and border guards in southern China to provide the closest possible coordination by. for example, setting up reception stations for smuggled goods in each small port along the coast.27 The Ministry of Trade then directed the CCP-controlled companies in Hong Kong to support the smuggling activities. 28" Page 26 [↩] [Cite]
Thai (2017). Page 25 [↩] [Cite]
Carrai (2019). "...creating the first truly independent customs office in Chinese history – since its establishment in the nineteenth century it had always been under British control." Page 156 [↩] [Cite]
The takeover of the ports went so fast, the CCP had no plan for administering the customs. 14-12-1952 Principles for Customs organization [↩] [Cite]
Thai (2017). Pages 20 [↩] [Cite]
Chen (2022). Page 582 [↩] [Cite]
Ginsburgs (1976). Page 7 [↩] [Cite]
Scott (1958). Page 157 [↩] [Cite]
Ginsburgs (1976). Pages 26-27 [↩] [Cite]
King (2022). Pages 695-696 [↩] [Cite]
Турицын (2018). "Thus, in 1949-1952, the system of Soviet-Chinese interbank settlements was roughly established. However, a careful study of the issue shows that despite the formal denomination in rubles, the settlements between the countries at this stage were, in one way or another, pegged to the dollar (and partly to the pound). And this was fundamentally unacceptable to the USSR leadership." Page 8
Original text: "Таким образом, в 1949-1952 гг. система советско-китайских межбанковских расчетов вчерне сложилась. Однако внимательное изучение вопроса показывает, что при формальном номинировании в рублях, так или иначе, расчеты между странами на этом этапе были привязаны к доллару (отчасти, фунту). И именно это принципиально не устраивало руководство СССР."
In 1950, the ruble was transferred to the "gold standard" China turned from a major buyer into a seller of gold. In the spring of 1950, this even caused a fall in gold prices on world markets. Page 10
"Significant difficulties in the development of interstate cooperation initially raised even the simplest questions, for example, those related to the procedure for paying contracts, with the acceptance of payments. However, such difficulties were resolved as quickly as possible, in a working order, by trade representatives, bank employees, etc."20 Page 11
Original text: "Немалые трудности в развитии межгосударственного сотрудничества поначалу порождали порой даже самые простые вопросы, к примеру, связанные с порядком оплаты контрактов, с акцептом платежей. Однако такого рода трудности по возможности оперативно, в рабочем порядке разрешались торговыми представителями, банковскими работниками и т.д. [20]"
The attempt of the SU to create a non-dollar market failed. "The actual abandonment of the plan to create a non-dollar market model during 1953-1956, largely due to domestic political processes in the USSR, predetermined indecision in making fundamental financial decisions, and moreover, the instability of the socialist camp in the long historical term." Page 18
Original text: "Фактический отказ от плана создания недолларовой рыночной модели в течение 1953-1956 гг., в решающей степени обусловленный внутриполитическими процессами в СССР, предопределил нерешительность в принятии принципиальных финансовых решений, более того, неустойчивость социалистического лагеря на длительную историческую перспективу. "
In August 1949, Liu Shaoqi asked the price of SU cars in dollars. 05-08-1949 Letter from Liu Shaoqi to Mikoyan [↩] [Cite]
Chen (2022). Page 596 [↩] [Cite]
Hung (1968). Page 3-5 Hung continues "As a matter of fact, Mainland. China does not earn foreign exchange from Hong Kong by merchandise trade only. Part of the foreign exchange which is not shown by the trade statistics is derived from her invisible incomes from Hong Kong … in the forms of oversea remittances and food parcels etc." Page 3-7 see also Article 58 [↩] [Cite]
Hsiao (1968). The conference was held from 3 to 12 April 1952. Despite a boycott by Western governments, it was attended by 471 individuals from 49 states. "As a result of the Conference, Peking entered into $160,000,000 (United States dollars) worth of trade agreements and contracts with England, France, and other European, Latin American, and Asian countries." Page 306.[Cite]
Gao (2015) writes about the French delegation signing an ageement with China: "Les négociations entre les deux délégations aboutirent à la signature d'un accord qui portait la valeur des échanges sino-français à 4 milliards de francs dans chaque sens pour l'année 1952. La Chine importerait des métaux, des machines, des produits pharmaceutiques, etc. et exporterait des soies, du thé, des produits de l'élevage, des huiles, etc. en France.3" Page 79
Translation "Negotiations between the two delegations led to the signing of an agreement which brought the value of Sino-French trade to 4 billion francs each way for the year 1952. China would import metals, machinery, pharmaceutical products , etc. and would export silks, tea, livestock products, oils, etc. to France.3" [↩] [Cite]
Peruzzi (2017). Page 32 [↩] [Cite]
Shao (1991). Page 43 [↩] [Cite]
General chamber of commerce Report for the year 1952 Page 37 [↩] [Cite]
Wang (1973). Page 186 [↩] [Cite]
Gosh (2017). Page 16 [↩] [Cite]
Hussain (2020). Page 153 [↩] [Cite]
Copper (2016). Page 10 [↩] [Cite]
Copper (2016). Page 97 [↩] [Cite]
Copper (2016). Page 98 [↩] [Cite]
Zhang (2014). Page 41 [↩] [Cite]
King (2016). Pages 60-61 [↩] [Cite]
01-06-1952 The first unofficial Sino-Japanese Trade Agreement. It was barter trade because China did not have sufficient foreign currency to pay for imports
King (2016). "However, this arrangement was problematic for Japan. The imports that Japan most needed from China were those found in Classes A and B, but the Japanese exports in Classes A and B were all considered ‘strategic’ items and therefore banned according to the US-led trade embargo. This meant that the majority of trade took place among Class C goods. In subsequent trade agreements, the category ratios and the goods comprising those ratios were therefore somewhat altered to allow more Sino-Japanese trade to take place, despite the trade embargo." Page 223 [↩][Cite]
Hsiao (1968). Pages 631-632 "A memorandum attached to the second agreement, October 29, 1953, stated: "The Contracting Parties agreed to exchange trade missions; Japan will establish her permanent trade mission in China when China's permanent trade mission has been established in Japan."83" Page 638 [↩] [Cite]
Skřivan (2012). Page 740 [↩] [Cite]
Jersild (2014). Page 60 [↩] [Cite]
Zofka (2023). Page 456 [↩] [Cite]
Chen (2022). Pages 603, 605 [↩] [Cite]
Gnoinska (2019). "To do so, the venture would appear simply as a shipping brokerage firm and Chipolbrok ships would officially belong to the Polish Ocean Lines, have Polish names, and operate under the Polish flag." Page 196 See also Pages 197-198 about the difficulties during the embargo period [↩] [Cite]
Jersild (2014). In January 1950, "...the Chinese prepared for the Czechoslovaks a list of goods “required by new China” in the process of reconstruction.18 ...The first trade agreement between the Chinese and the Czechoslovaks was signed on 16 April 1950 " Page 60 [Cite]
Copper (2016) Volume I Page 116 [↩] [Cite]
Dahlberg (2019). Page 10 [↩] [Cite]
Ching (2006). Page 185 [↩] [Cite]
Wang (1973). Page 186 note 12 [↩] [Cite]
Huwaidin (2002). Page 97 [↩] [Cite]